Enter the characters shown in the image.

You are here

How to be sure a test has actually failed

1 post / 0 new
Anonymous's picture
How to be sure a test has actually failed

Failure isn't an option in many situations, but mistakes and errors can cause complications to arise that can be difficult to recover from. This is why agile testing methodologies have become so integral in software development and release. The involvement of quality assurance personnel from the beginning of a project ensures that testing can begin right away, enabling teams to build a better quality product.

However, can you really count on your tests to be correct every time? Tests are only as good as their programmers, and human flaws can throw a wrench into testing efforts. Teams must be confident that their tests are performing correctly in order to keep progressing. Let's take a look at a few tips that will help you be sure that a test has actually failed and create steps to improve operations.

Gain guidance prior to test runs

Insight will be a major factor in maintaining and improving your test cases. The only way to get this is to have a clear view of the requirements and how developers are working to deliver on these needs. QA teams can also glean a lot of information once their tests are run, but the initial legwork can help ensure that tests are performing correctly from the very beginning. TechBeacon contributor Christine Parizo noted that turning failures into test cases for future releases will help create a stronger test base and ensure that scripts are finding all possible errors. In addition, working alongside developers can help QA catch omissions and errors faster and create a collaborative environment.

"Over time, getting familiar with the software and with its areas of potential weaknesses — because no software is free of those — builds an additional level of instinct-based, ad hoc testing," QA engineer Olga Nikulina told Parizo.

Beware of false negatives and positives

Organizations must ensure that their tests are regularly evaluated and adjusted to verify that they are working as intended and that they continue to provide value to testing operations. However, it's important for testing teams to be aware of false negative and false positive results. As DevelopSense's Michael Bolton noted, a passing or failing test is not a guarantee that the product is or isn't working correctly. It's very easy for elements to appear like they're functioning appropriately, but can break down upon release. Take GUI testing, for example. An automation testing tool might pass this type of test because computers solely evaluate code integrity, not aesthetics. But there could be glaring errors only visible when the program meets a real user. Bolton explained that passed tests simply signify use specific inputs based on a few requirements, meaning that any slight changes could easily put it into the failing category.

At the same time, a failure is not always conclusive when it comes to testing. Misunderstanding a requirement or misconfiguring the test platform can easily result in a failed test, even if nothing is actually wrong with it. Teams must take a deep dive into the causes of failed tests to ensure that the result was accurate and wasn't caused by outside forces.

"The timing of the test may be off, such that system was not ready for the input we provided," Bolton wrote. "There may be an as-yet-not-understood reason why the product is providing a result which seems incorrect to us, but which is in fact correct. A failing test is an allegation of failure."

Use capable tools

One means of ensuring test result accuracy is to keep detailed records through a capable test management tool. This type of asset not only enables team members to collaborate across projects, but they can also actively write, assign, schedule and adjust test cases as needed. With this resource, teams can look at their progress, evaluate whether their testing results are correct and catch bugs early on that can slip through the cracks. Using a variety of software testing metrics, analysis and test data, and organizations can reduce false outcomes, improve overall reliability and produce a quality product.

Rooting out problem test cases can be a challenge, but it's necessary to build confidence in testing efforts. By deriving guidance prior to test executions, leveraging capable tools and understanding how to spot false results, QA teams can have peace of mind that their test outcomes are accurate and can use these conclusions to direct testing efforts in the future.


Testing tool manufacturers world-wide list
10Levels ABID CONSULTING AccelQ Accord Software ActiMind AdaCore
AdaLog AgileLoad AgileWay Agitar Algorismi ALL4TEC
Andreas Kleffel Android Apache Apica Apollo Systems
Applitools AppPerfect Appsee ApTest Assertible Assure
Atlassian AutoIt Consulti .. Automation Anyw .. Automation Cons .. Axosoft Aztaz Software
Backtrace I/O Badboy BlazeMeter Borvid BrowserStack BSQUARE
BStriker Intern .. CA Technologies Canonical Canoo Engineeri .. Catch Software CelestialTeapot
Chris Mallett Cleanscape ClicTest CloudQA Codeborne CodeCentrix
CodePlex projec .. Codoid Cogitek Compuware Configure IT Conflair
ConSol Core Services Coronys Ltd Countersoft CresTech Softwa .. CrossBrowserTes ..
Crosscheck Netw .. Crowdsourced Te .. Cucumber Ltd Cyara Cygnet Infotech DareBoost
Databene Datamatics Glob .. DevExpress DTM soft Dynatrace LLC EasyQA
Eclipse EkaTechserv Elvior Emmanuel Jorge Empirix EPAM Systems
Equafy Esterel Technol .. eXept Software .. Experitest Finaris Froglogic
FrontEndART Ltd GeneXus GitHub project gnoso Google Code Pro .. GrammaTech
Gurock Software HelpSystems HENIX Hewlett Packard .. Hexawise High-Tech Bridg ..
Hiptest Hitex IBM Rational imbus Shanghai Impetus Inflectra
informUp InTENSO - IT Ex .. Ipswitch Jamo Solutions Janova JAR Technologie ..
JBoss Developer jClarity JetBrains Jively jQuery foundati ..
JS Foundation Jspresso Kanoah KMS Technology Kualitee LDRA Limited
Litmus LoadFocus Loadster Perfor .. MarathonITE Marketcircle Marketcircle
Maveryx Meliora Ltd Micro Focus Sof .. Microsoft Mobile Labs Mobile1st
Mockaroo, LLC Monkop Mozila MSys Technologi .. Navicat NeoTys
Neowise Softwar .. NetCart NORIZZK.COM Novosync Mobili .. NRG Global NTT Resonant
OC Systems Odin Technology OpCord Oracle Orcanos Original Softwa ..
OW2 PANAYA Parasoft PassMark Patterson Consu .. Perfecto Mobile
Pivotal, Inc. Plutora Postman (API To .. PractiTest PrimaTest Process One
Programming Res .. Psoda PureLoad PushToTest Python Q-Assurance
QA Systems QACube QASymphony QAWorks QMetry Quali
Qualitia Softwa .. Quality First S .. Quotium RadView Softwar .. Ranorex RedLine13
Reflective Solu .. ReQtest RevDeBug Robotium Tech Rogue Wave Soft .. Rommana Softwar ..
RTTS Runscope Sandklef GNU La .. Sauce Labs Seapine Softwar ..
SeleniumHQ Sencha Sensiple Siemens PLM Sof .. SmartBear Softw .. SmarteSoft
SOASTA SoftLogica Softomotive Softsmith Solution-Soft SonarSource
Sourceforge Spirent Technol .. SQS Software Qu .. Square Stimulus Techno .. Swifting AB
Synopsys T-komp T-Plan TechExcel TechTalk Telerik By Prog ..
Tellurium Test Collab Test Goat Test Recon TestCaseLab Gm ..
TestCraft Techn .. Testenium TestingBot TestLodge Testmunk
Testomato TestOptimal TestPlant TestPro Testsigma Techn .. Testuff
The Core Bankin .. The MathWorks The Open Group Thoughtbot Thoughtworks Time Simulator Top-Q Trace Technolog .. TrendIC TRICENTIS
Tritusa Pty Ltd TWD Solutions P .. TypeMock Tyto Software Ubertesters UniTESK
Universal Test .. Usetrace Ltd Utrecht Univers .. Validata Group Vanamco AG Vector Software
Veracode Verifaya Corpor .. Verit VersionOne Vornex Inc. WcfStorm Soluti .. We Are Mammoth Web Performance .. Wintask Wireshark Found ..
Worksoft Xceptance XK72 Xpand IT XQual ZAPTEST
Zeenyx Software .. Zephyr Zeta Software zutubi pty

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti