Code reviews are a set of proposed changes in a software application’s code. Code reviews can be conducted in a wide range of contexts and the skills and experience of those performing it differ widely. There should be a balance between processes and a highly collaborative environment. Software developers are expected to participate in performing code reviews, however, only a few are offered training for an effective code review process. Participants attempt to find the most suitable solution to problems within a time constraint. But the underlying question remains unanswered, what is a good code review, or how to ensure a good code review? Well, the answer is to look for code review services that match your business requirements and help in achieving your goals.
Participants may not have any sort of personal relationship with each other. Thus they may not communicate outside of the code review process. On the contrary, there are code reviews where participants have to interact on a daily basis since everyone works at the same company. Good participants adjust how they participate in code reviews according to their knowledge. Although it is important to adjust their communication style according to the recipients. Thus, this is one by keeping three factors in mind; the purpose of code review intended audience and the relationship with the audience.
Knowing the Audience
When beginning code reviews, it is important to observe the following tips to identify vulnerabilities and make the most of code review services:
Start by reading the code - It is important to realize that the developer gave their time and energy. Make sure you read and understand the patch, and record all your concerns separately so that you understand the complete context before giving any feedback. Make sure you put in efforts to the purposes for which the code reviews are being carried out.
Submit feedback after reading and understanding the changes - Make sure that your comments focus only on the code and the solution it offers. It is important that you have a productive relationship with the submitter.
Developing a partnership
When there is a high level of experience between the code submitter and reviewer. If a reviewer has more experience than the submitter, he may choose to accept the submitter’s patch as it it and then improve it and communicate with the submitter to inform him about the changes he made later. It is important to have a conversation in public so that the observers can learn. Usually, the code reviews provided by someone more experienced than the reviewer are usually accepted in the same form, or a few changes are requested. It is not an easy task to achieve the desired results from code reviews if they are not performed in the right manner. Thus, it is important to invest in reliable code review services from a renowned software testing company to make most of the testing efforts and achieve business goals.
As a Senior Marketing Consultant at Kualitatem, Ray Parker loves to write tech-related news, articles, specifically quality assurance and information security. Apart from his techie appearance, he enjoys soccer, reading mysteries, and spending long hours working over at the New York office.
Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti